In recent weeks GOP congressmen have resorted to all sorts of underhanded schemes to avoid interacting with their angry constituents back home over August recess. Now two Republican freshmen, Reps. Daniel Webster (R-FL) and Tim Griffin (R-AZ), are taking this trend one step further, using disturbing intimidation tactics and “watch lists” to discourage constituents from asking them questions:
Rep. Webster’s Winter Garden, Florida district office gave out a “Watch List” of six Floridians who had asked questions at Webster’s previous town halls. The list, with the header “For the Media,” included names, photographs, and questions that members of the media should ask them.
The Watch List itself doesn’t contain any information on who wrote it or where it comes from.The memos surfaced in Arkansas in connection to the office of Rep. Tim Griffin, and were traced back to Rep. Webster’s office.
With black and white photos that resemble police surveillance, some of them pulled from the individuals’ Facebook profiles, the memo is clearly meant to intimidate these six people and anyone else who might stand up and ask a question of their elected representative. At a Griffin town hall, staffers were handing out the Watch List to attendees, calling it their “homework.” Griffin staffers were also spotted taking photos and shooting video of attendees, creating an extra layer of intimidation.
While Webster and Griffin are ostensibly making these lists to screen out paid activists, the people they are targeting are regular constituents who have simply spoken up and expressed their disagreement about important policy decisions. Nevertheless, Webster staffers clearly went out of their way to investigate the backgrounds of these individuals and insinuate people like them are not welcome at future town halls.
In April, ThinkProgress reported from Webster’s home district about a town hall where he faced a barrage of criticism for defending his support for tax breaks for the rich and the Medicare-ending Paul Ryan budget. One of the constituents ThinkProgress interviewed, Tamecka Pierce, ended up as #5 on the “Watch List.”
Pierce, who had to undergo chemotherapy, asked Webster a tough question about what would happen to people like her with major preexisting conditions under the Republican budget. She expressed her disappointment in Webster for dodging her question — which apparently was enough to land her on a McCarthy-esque list that pictures her like a criminal.
In another instance, the memo suggests that members of the media question the military service of a 66-year-old Vietnam veteran named Ron Parsell. Parsell told the Orlando Sentinel, “I think it’s pretty weird. Someone asks a legitimate question, and all of a sudden somebody’s got a dossier on you.” Parsell added, “It’s the type of thing they’d do in old Russia.”
Florida state Rep. Ritch Workman (R) is tackling the unemployment rate in the most bizarre way possible. The Florida Current reports that Workman filed a bill to repeal the state’s ban on “dwarf-tossing” — the practice of “launching little people for the amusement of an audience.” Though he doesn’t condone the act, he insists that the ban flies in the face of freedom and the American way.
Florida’s law prohibits any establishment that sells alcohol from allowing any activity “involving exploitation endangering the health, safety, and welfare of any person with dwarfism.” Florida and New York are currently the only two states banning the practice and Florida can fine up to $1,000 or suspend an alcohol license for a violation.
There has been one lawsuit filed by a little person seeking a repeal of the ban for employment purposes but others, including the president of Little People of America, Gary Arnold, questioned the effort to bring back an activity that, aside from the physical danger, is “dehumanizing and reminiscent of circus sideshow days.” “The ban on dwarf tossing protects the entire dwarf community,” Arnold said.
Asked about the humiliating nature of “dwarf-tossing,” Workman replied, “What about the one employed by it?” “The reality is what is good for one person may not be good for another,” he added.